People v. Tolbert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in failing to advise defense counsel of the contents of a note received from the jury during deliberations and to provide defense counsel with an opportunity to assist the court in formulating the response to the note (see, People v O’Rama, 78 NY2d 270, 276-278). The court read the note in open court in the presence of defendant and defense counsel prior to providing a response to the jury. By failing to raise any objection to the procedure utilized by the court, defendant has failed to preserve his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. MedinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. DePilloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. AlbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. GoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. PellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. KisoonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- GOLEY, KRISTA M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.