Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 8, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress items of physical evidence without conducting a hearing. The motion, “made at the beginning of trial, was untimely and was not made in writing or supported by sworn allegations of fact (see, CPL 255.20, 710.40, 710.60)” (People v Massimi, 191 AD2d 969). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the 9th, 10th and 11th counts of the indictment (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19; People v Thomas, 239 AD2d 246, lv denied 90 NY2d…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. People v. RiveraNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. JenkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. McQueenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API