People v. Medina
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of Appellate Division should be affirmed.
At one point during the trial, defense counsel asked the People’s witness to reveal the name of the informant who had arranged the cocaine sale and later gave the police the information which led to defendant’s arrest (see People v Goggins, 34 NY2d 163, cert den 419 US 1012). The informant’s identity was not disclosed, however, because the Trial Judge sustained the District Attorney’s prompt objection to the question. Since the District Attorney was obviously unwilling to permit the witness to disclose the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GogginsNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- New York v. GogginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
3Cited by406 opinions
- People v. McHarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. BaldoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. JalahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. GillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MalaveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
401 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.