Legal Opinion
Government Employees Insurance v. Five Boro Psychological Services, P.C.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided April 15, 2013No. 12 Civ. 2448PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
JOHN GLEESON, District Judge.
In this civil action, Plaintiffs Government Employees Insurance Co., GEICO Indemnity Co., GEICO General Insurance Company, and GEICO Casualty Co. (collectively referred to here by the singular “GEICO”) seek to recover, before trebling, over $2 million in damages arising from its payment of Defendants’ allegedly fraudulent bills for no-fault insurance benefits. GEICO also seeks a declaration that it is not obligated to pay almost $8 million.dollars in what GEICO alleges are “pending fraudulent” no-fault bills for psychological services. Compl. ¶¶…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Wilton v. Seven Falls Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. ParisienDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Allstate Insurance v. MunCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. MunCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Government Employees Insurance Company v. Landow, M.D.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Eclipse Medical Imaging, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.