Legal Opinion
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Parisien
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided November 26, 2018No. 18-CV-289PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. Leo Glasser, Senior United States District Judge
Plaintiffs State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (together, "Plaintiffs" or "State Farm") bring this action seeking damages for benefits paid under no-fault automobile insurance policies for services rendered or purportedly rendered by Defendants. (ECF No. 5 ("Am. Compl.") ). State Farm also seeks a *220declaratory judgment that Defendants are not entitled to collect any future no-fault benefits for services rendered to date and through the pendency of the litigation. (Am. Compl. ¶¶ 261-269).…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- AIG Europe, S.A. v. Sears Holding CorporationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Community Medical Imaging, P.C.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- Allstate Insurance Company v. PierreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- American Transit Insurance Company v. PierreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2024
- GEICO v. PatelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2026
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.