Legal Opinion
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Hudson River-Black River Regulating District
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 7, 2012No. Docket 10-4402-cvPublishedCited by 267 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff-appellant Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, doing business as National Grid (“National Grid”), challenges the constitutional and statutory authority of defendant-appellee Hudson River-Black River Regulating District (“the District”), a New York public benefit corporation, to assess it for benefits that its property along the Hudson River receives from a dam and reservoir that the District operates. National Grid argues that the District’s assessment and apportionment scheme is federally preempted by the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), see 16 U.S.C. §§…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by267 opinions
- Mary Jo C. v. New York State and Local Retirement System et ano.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Selevan v. New York Thruway Authority (NYTA)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Ramos v. Baldor Specialty Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Admiral Ins. Co. v. Niagara Transformer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- Avraham Gold v. New York Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
262 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.