Legal Opinion

Randol v. Harbour-Longmire Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 20, 1927No. 18665PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff in error was defendant in the trial court and the defendant in error was plaintiff. The parties will be referred to herein as they appear in the trial court.

"05 Jhe 24th day of November, 1924, the plaintiff, Harbour-Longmire Company, commenced an action against E. D. Reid et al. and R. W. Randol in the district court of Carter county. The plaintiff sought to foreclose a chattel mortgage in which plaintiff alleged the defendant Randol claimed some interest therein subject to the right of the plaintiff. The defendant Randol filed his, answer and cross-petition, in which he denies…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Hardy, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. City of Lawton v. HillsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Armstrong v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Harbour-Longmire Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  5. Howe v. TarloshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Chamberlin v. ChamberlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Board of Ed. v. Philadelphia Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. In Re Estate of GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Welch v. WelchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  5. Harris v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API