Legal Opinion

Acosta v. Clark

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 21, 1984No. 834DC430PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

The undisputed facts are as follows: On 15 May 1980, the parties entered into a valid and enforceable separation agreement and property settlement which contained, inter alia, the following provisions relating to the payment of alimony by the plaintiff-husband to the defendant-wife:(6) . . . The husband [plaintiff] hereby acknowledges that the Wife [defendant] is entitled to alimony . . . until remarriage.

Husband agrees to pay to the Wife the sum of $300.00 per month for her support and maintenance until remarriage.

The provisions for payment of alimony to the Wife shall not be…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. White v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marks v. MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Shannon v. Quinn (In Re Quinn)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1988
  4. Holcomb v. HolcombCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Marks v. MarksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API