Holcomb v. Holcomb
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HORTON, Judge.
The trial court was called upon to determine whether the monthly $500.00 payments to defendant, which were designated as alimony in the Agreement, were in fact “true” alimony payments and thus modifiable, or were reciprocal consideration for property settlement provisions in the Agreement, and thus not modifiable. In order to rule upon plaintiff’s assignments of error, we must determine whether the trial court applied the correct legal principles in concluding that the Agreement was an integrated agreement and denying plaintiff’s motion to reduce or terminate his monthly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Zinn v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Marks v. MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fucito v. FrancisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005