Legal Opinion

Marks v. Marks

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1985No. 8418DC934PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

As the trial court did, we first address the issue of whether the 21 May 1974 consent judgment was modifiable by motion in the cause. For reasons set out below, we hold that it was not and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

As has been noted in many similar cases, there are essentially two types of consent judgments. One is a contract that is approved by the court. It is enforceable or modifiable as an ordinary contract — by an independent action brought by one of the parties. See, e.g., Moore v. Moore, 297 N.C. 14, 252 S.E. 2d 735 (1979). The other is an actual…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Bunn v. BunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marks v. MarksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API