Legal Opinion

Sanberg v. Margold Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 9, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action to recover a down payment of $1,000 made to defendant on a contract for the purchase of a vacant piece of real estate in the city of New York, together with the interest thereon, and the reasonable expense of examining the title. The defendant counterclaimed for specific performance.

At the trial at Special Term, Bronx county, plaintiffs’ complaint was dismissed at the close of the case, and judgment was granted to defendant on its counterclaim for specific performance. This appeal is from that decision and the judgment thereon.

On March 29, 1929, the parties…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Watson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Raben v. RisnikoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. Ross v. Keaton Tire & Rubber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Von Bargen v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garre v. GerykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  2. Dunbar & Sullivan Dredging Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. V.A. Tellis v. Briamar AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API