Legal Opinion
Garre v. Geryk
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 6, 1958PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendants for specific performance and damages because of their failure to carry out an alleged agreement to sell real estate located in Bristol. The complaint contained two counts. The defendants demurred to both counts, and the demurrer was sustained. On the failure of the plaintiff to plead further, judgment was rendered for the defendants. The plaintiff appealed from the judgment. As he has pursued only his claim that the court erred in sustaining the demurrer to the first count, we confine ■our discussion to that claim.
The plaintiff alleged…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Santoro v. MackSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Goldman v. FeinbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Didriksen v. HavensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- American Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. EckhardtIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
- Tseka v. ScherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Lynch v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Montanaro v. PandolfiniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Society for SavingsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Pigeon v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.