Legal Opinion
Ross v. Keaton Tire & Rubber Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 13, 1922No. Civ. No. 3629PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action in unlawful detainer. Judgment went for plaintiff, from which defendant has appealed.
Plaintiff was the owner of a vacant lot in Los Angeles and, by a lease prepared by her and executed by the parties on November 29, 1919, she let and demised the same, with a two-story building to be erected thereon, to defendant for a term of ten years from the completion of the building. The portion of the lease pertinent to the question presented is as follows:
“The party of the first part [plaintiff] does hereby lease to the party of the second part [defendant] . . . her lot, 1337 S. Flower St., Los…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Daggett v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Weed v. Lindsay & MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Vaughan v. FordMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Bloomington Canning Co. v. Union Can Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901
3Cited by8 opinions
- Clark v. City of Humansville, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Garre v. GerykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Perry v. ReynoldsIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. FitzgeraldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Plecas v. DevichUtah Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.