Legal Opinion

Von Bargen v. Ginsberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKapper, J.

On August 14, 1925, the plaintiff, as vendor, and defendant, as vendee, entered into a contract for the sale of real property on Bedford avenue, Brooklyn, for a consideration of $27,000. Apart from a statement of the rentals derived from various parts of the premises, the only description of the property *546is stated in the contract, as follows: “ all that lot or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon, in the Borough of Brooklyn, County of Kings, City and State of New York, property known as and by the Street number 1441 Bedford Avenue, being an eight family brick and stone…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Faure v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  3. Raben v. RisnikoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  4. Floeting v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Bargen v. GinsbergNew York Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. Margold Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Bramaric v. ChurichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Sanberg v. Margold Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  4. Cohen v. Kingsboro Securities Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Millfield Realty Co. v. CatenaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API