Raben v. Risnikoff
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
. Appeal by the defendant, Morris Risnikoff, from, a judgment of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of the Bronx, in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the 4th day of December, 1903.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
Louis Wax was the vendee and Morris Risnikoff, the defendant, was the vendor in a contract for the sale and purchase of real estate in the borough of Brooklyn. At the time and place fixed for closing the title, the vendee refused to accept a deed offered in behalf of the vendor, on the ground that there was a deficiency in the quantity , of the property offered to be conveyed, and on the further ground that there was a mortgage of $600 upon the premises which was not specified in the contract. The plaintiff sues as the assignee of Louis Wax, the vendee, to recover $150…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Higgins v. . EagletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- Griesemer v. HammondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Floeting v. HorowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Von Bargen v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- Sanberg v. Margold Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- Bargen v. GinsbergNew York Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.