Legal Opinion
Cotton v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 28, 2003No. CIV.A.01-0801TFH/DARPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBINSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action was referred to the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for full case management on July IS, 2001 (Docket No. 4). By a motion filed on April 17, .2003, Plaintiffs ask the undersigned to recuse herself from this action. As grounds therefore, Plaintiffs invoke § 455(a) of Title 28 of the United States Code, and maintain that the undersigned’s rulings have deprived Plaintiff Ralph Cotton of “his right to conduct discovery and to advance this case to trial.” Motion for Recusal (Docket No. 91) at l. 1…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Tripp v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- James v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Holmes v. NBC/GEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ramirez v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Walsh v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Middlebrooks v. St. Coletta of Greater Washington, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.