Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 25, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2006-0670PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Larry Klayman’s (“Klayman”) [298] Motion for Recusal and/or Disqualification, in which Klayman argues that this Court should recuse itself pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). Klayman contends that recusal is warranted because the Court’s rulings in this case, along with the fact that the undersigned was appointed by former President William J. Clinton, create an appearance of bias against him. Defendants oppose the motion, arguing that Klayman has failed to set forth sufficient grounds for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- Liberty Lobby, Inc. v. Dow Jones & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Loving Spirit Foundation Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Act Now to Stop War and End Racism Coalition v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Jordan v. U.S. Dep't of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Sataki v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.