Ray v. Mason County Drain Commissioner
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
This is a significant case of first impression relating to Michigan’s world-famous Environmental Protection Act (EPA).1 The question involved is the kind of findings of fact required of the trial judge by GCR 1963, 517 and § 3(1) of the EPA in deciding an action brought under the EPA.
In the instant case the trial judge failed to make specific findings of facts. Rather than attempt a review de novo, we remand for full and specific findings of fact under Dauer v Zabel, 381 Mich 555, 558; 164 NW2d 1 (1969). To assist the trial judge, especially since this is a case of first impression, we set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Osius v. City of St. Clair ShoresMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
- State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Daniels v. Allen Industries, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Gibbons v. FarwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Dauer v. ZabelMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- National Wildlife Federation v. Cleveland Cliffs Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Ontario v. City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.