Legal Opinion

Battelle v. Cushing

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 16, 1892No. 12,158PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Hearing on an appeal by complainant from decree dismissing bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hagner

The defendants Denison and Cushing are sued in their own right; and Denison and Cone, as trustees in a deed of trust from the complainant, of the 13th day of May, 1887. The complainant charges that in May, 1887, she called upon the defendant Denison, a real estate agent, with whom she had no previous acquaintance, informed him she had money to invest, and requested him to act as her agent in its investment in the purchase of real estate in the District; that thereupon Denison undertook to advise with the complainant as to what would be prudent investments, and informed her he thought he could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Holland v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866
  3. Starkweather v. BenjaminMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hale v. PhilbrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  5. McKee v. EatonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. GibsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. Hiltpold v. SternDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
  3. Greene v. Gibraltar Mortgage Investment Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1980
  4. Goldsten v. BurkaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API