Legal Opinion
Hiltpold v. Stern
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 28, 1951No. 1067PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Elizabeth A. Stern signed a sales contract for the purchase of a lot owned by defendants. Alleging that she was induced to sign this contract in 1946 by the fraudulent misrepresentations of defendant Harold Hiltpold, she brought this action in 1949 1 to recover certain payments she had made totaling $1,560 and to cancel the contract. 2 The action was tried without a jury. The court in a memorandum opinion found for the plaintiff and entered judgment for the amount claimed plus interest and costs. Defendants appeal.
Miss Stern is a middle-aged woman employed by a…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Graffam v. BurgessSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Harris v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Platt v. Bradner Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- McNabb v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
- Cafritz v. KoslowCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1948
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Beckman v. FarmerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re Ampicillin Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Urban Investments, Inc. v. BranhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Pyne v. Jamaica Nutrition Holdings Ltd.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.