Hollywood Credit Clothing Co. v. Gibson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment denying appellant recovery of the purchase price of a television set. The testimony of appellee, largely uncontradicted and evidently accepted by the trial court, was that two days before Christmas he went to appellant’s store and looked at a television, that appellant’s salesman told him the price was $189 and he agreed to buy it at that price; that a conditional sales contract was filled in and he signed it; that when he arrived at home with the set he looked at his account book (apparently he was not given a copy of the conditional bill of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bob Wilson, Inc. v. SwannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Battelle v. CushingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1892
- Cunningham Manufacturing Co. v. Rotograph Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1908
- Universal Jewelry Co. v. McIverDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
3Cited by26 opinions
- Tsintolas Realty Co. v. MendezDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Urban Investments, Inc. v. BranhamDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- Haynes v. KuderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Owen v. OwenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
- Hart v. Vermont Investment Ltd. PartnershipDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.