McKee v. Eaton
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Marshall District Court. ' At the March Term, 1881, of the district court, Eaton and three others, as defendants, recovered a judgment against McKee and four others, as plaintiffs, who bring the ease here. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On the 3d day of January, 1881, the plaintiffs in error filed their petition in the district court of Marshall county against the defendants in error, alleging *228statementof substantially, that on the 18th day of June, 1880, one of the plaintiffs, Frank McKee, was seized in fee simple of the Tremont Hotel, at Marysville, with the furniture and fixtures therein, all of the value of $6,000; that the defendants represented to them that they were the owners of a certain patent, No. 184,498, of date of November 21,1876, for an “improvement in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- First National Bank v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- David v. ParkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- Leavenworth, Lawrence & Galveston Rld. v. Comm'rs of Douglas CountySupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Claggett v. CrallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
3Cited by24 opinions
- Spreckels v. GorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Reeves v. CorningU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1892
- Hoock v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.