Legal Opinion
CBS, INC. v. Henkin
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided October 7, 1992No. S90-612MPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MILLER, District Judge.
This cause is before the court on defendant Mary Henkin’s motion for summary judgment on Counts I, II, V, and VI of the complaint of plaintiff CBS, Inc. (“CBS”). For the reasons that follow, the court concludes that Mrs. Henkin’s motion must be granted.
I. Background
In May 1970, Dan Henkin, Mary Henkin, and five other individuals formed the Gem-' einhardt Corporation (“Gemeinhardt”) for the sole purpose of purchasing all of the outstanding stock of K.G. Gemeinhardt Company, Inc. (“KGGC"), which owned and operated a flute and piccolo plant in Elk-hart,…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sidney S. Arst Co. v. Pipefitters Welfare Educ. Fund, Defendant-Third/party v. Michael Rand Arst and Donald Takacs, Third/partyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United Steelworkers of America v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Dana Corp. v. American Standard, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1994
- Nutrasweet Co. v. X-L Engineering Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- United States v. High Point Chemical Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1998