Nutrasweet Co. v. X-L Engineering Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
NORGLE, District Judge:
Before the court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, the motion is granted as to liability and denied as to damages.
I
Plaintiff NutraSweet Company and its parent company, Monsanto Company (collectively, “NutraSweet”), claim that Defendant X-L Engineering Corporation (“X-L”) and its president and majority owner, Paul Prikos 1 (“Prikos”), illegally “dumped” toxic chemicals which eventually migrated to, and polluted, NutraSweet’s land. According to NutraSweet, the dumping violated two sections of the Comprehensive…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Freeport-McMoran Resource Partners Ltd. Partnership v. B-B Paint Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
- Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago v. Lake River Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Harcros Chemicals, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.