Legal Opinion
United Steelworkers of America v. Oregon Steel Mills, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 3, 2003No. 01-1379PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OBERDORFER, District Judge.
Plaintiff United Steelworkers of America (“USWA”) brought this action under the citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. § 7604, alleging that the CF & I Steel Mill in Pueblo, Colorado (the “Pueblo Mill”) was operating in violation of certain CAA requirements. The District Court dismissed the two causes of action in USWA’s amended complaint on separate jurisdictional grounds, and dismissed both claims against Oregon Steel Mills, Inc. (“Oregon Steel”) on the further ground that USWA had failed to plead sufficient facts to state a claim against…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Sutton v. Utah State School for the Deaf & BlindCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- United States v. JarvisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Elephant Butte Irrigation District v. United States Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Shimomura v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Breaux v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.