Personnel Commission v. Barstow Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHLI, J.
Respondents Personnel Commission of the Barstow Unified School District (Commission) and California School Employees Association (CSEA) sought a writ of mandate compelling appellants Barstow Unified School District and its board of trustees (collectively referred to as the District) to vacate their decision to lay off the District’s transportation workers and contract with appellant Mayflower Contract Services, Inc. (Mayflower) for transportation services. The lower court ruled the District’s actions violated the Education Code, and granted a writ. We do not reach the issue…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Parker v. BowronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Carsten v. Psychology Examining CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel Commission of the Pajaro Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- County of Contra Costa v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- San Diego Teachers Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of San JoseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Hott v. College of the Sequoias Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Hood v. Compton Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- (PS) Miller v. Sacramento City Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Opinion No. (2004), California Attorney General Reports2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.