Legal Opinion

Hood v. Compton Community College District

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2005No. B169632PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SUZUKAWA, J. *

Plaintiffs Ernestine Hood, Margie M.L. Miles, and Manette Wesley, who were classified employees assigned to the staff of the Personnel Commission of the Compton Community College District (Personnel Commission), sued the Compton Community College District (District) for constructive discharge and other employment-related claims. The District obtained summary judgment on the erroneous theory that the Personnel Commission, and not the District, was the plaintiffs’ employer. The plaintiffs then sued the Personnel Commission, which obtained summary judgment on the theories…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California School Employees Ass'n v. Personnel Commission of the Pajaro Valley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ellis v. McKinnon Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. Jose A.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Personnel Commision v. Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. United Public Employees v. Public Employment Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bettencourt v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API