Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committee
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
May a member of an administrative agency employ judicial processes to challenge the legality of action taken by the very board on which he or she serves as a member? In probing this unique issue we plow untilled ground: our attention has not been directed to authority in any jurisdiction directly on point.1
Appellant Arlene Carsten (hereinafter petitioner) filed a petition for writ of mandate in the superior court to compel the Psychology Examining Committee of the Board of Medical Quality Assurance of the State of California to comply with Business and Professions Code section…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.