Legal Opinion

Carsten v. Psychology Examining Committee

California Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1980No. L.A. 31202PublishedCited by 99 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

May a member of an administrative agency employ judicial processes to challenge the legality of action taken by the very board on which he or she serves as a member? In probing this unique issue we plow untilled ground: our attention has not been directed to authority in any jurisdiction directly on point.1

Appellant Arlene Carsten (hereinafter petitioner) filed a petition for writ of mandate in the superior court to compel the Psychology Examining Committee of the Board of Medical Quality Assurance of the State of California to comply with Business and Professions Code section…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by99 opinions

  1. Christensen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Dix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. San Francisco Airports CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API