Legal Opinion

International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of San Jose

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 2011No. H035065; No. H035425PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

These appeals arise from a labor dispute between the City of San Jose (City) and the International Association of Firefighters, Local 230 (Union), which represents the firefighters employed by the City. After the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act (Gov. Code, §§ 3250-3262; FFBOR)1 became effective in 2008, the Union requested that the City meet and confer over the implementation of the FFBOR’s new procedures for administrative appeals of firefighter discipline. The City refused to meet and confer on the ground that, as a charter city, it was…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Glendale City Employees' Ass'n v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. City of Palo Alto v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
  3. San Diego Municipal Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Boling v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Oyarzo v. Tuolumne Fire DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API