Hickey v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The plaintiff sued the defendant in assumpsit to recover $60, which he averred defendant had unlawfully and unjustly required him to pay before it would resume supplying him with electricity. In his statement of claim he averred that defendant’s agents had previously cut the electric wires leading into his premises, shut off the electrical current and removed the meter because, they alleged, the meter had been tampered with. Said charge of $60 had been imposed by defendant to reimburse itself for the damage alleged to have been done it by the tampering with said meter,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Leiper v. Baltimore & Philadelphia RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Skelton v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- St. Clair Borough v. Tamaqua & Pottsville Elec. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- York Water Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Fogelsville & Trexlertown Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Lansdale Borough v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
- Drexelbrook Associates v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- U. I. U. v. U. F. W., C. I. O.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Upholsterers' International Union v. United Furniture WorkersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.