City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
The question raised by the instant appeals is whether the existence of a permit to occupy a rail-highway crossing, issued by a municipality to a public utility on the condition that the utility assume financial responsibility for any relocation of its facilities necessitated by a public project, *315divests the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“Commission”) of jurisdiction to allocate the utility’s relocation costs to the municipality, where those costs have not been paid at the time of the Commission’s decision.
I
On January 10, 1980, the City of Philadelphia…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Feingold v. Bell of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Upper St. Clair TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Citizens Passenger Railway Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Chester County v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Duquesne Light Co. v. BaraschSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- PECO Energy Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- At & T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.