Legal Opinion

Steuben v. City of Lincoln

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1996No. S-94-066PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Charles and Rebecca Steuben brought this action against the City of Lincoln (City) for damages to their house and personal property sustained as a result of floodwaters. At trial, the Steubens advanced two theories of recovery against the City: (1) negligence under the Political Subdivisions Tort Claims Act, Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 13-901 through 13-926 (Reissue 1991) and (2) inverse condemnation under Neb. Const, art. I, § 21. After a bench trial, the district court for Lancaster County held that either the several alleged acts of negligence were not actionable or the Steubens failed to show the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Association of Commonwealth v. MoylanNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. VRT, INC. v. Dutton-Lainson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Krambeck v. City of GretnaNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. MOORE BY AND THROUGH MOORE v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. RaDec Construction Inc. v. School District No. 17Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. McWhirt v. HeaveyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Zimmerman v. FirsTier Bank, N.A.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. City of Tupelo, Mississippi v. John Patterson (Pat) O'CallaghanMississippi Supreme Court · 2017
  5. David P. Garr Jr. and Julie A. Garr v. City of Ottumwa, IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API