Legal Opinion

VRT, INC. v. Dutton-Lainson Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1995No. S-93-907PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

The plaintiff-appellee seller, VRT, Inc., formerly known as Sanitas, Inc., sought a judgment declaring its right to past and future royalties under a provision within a purchase and sale contract. VRT alleged that the defendant-appellant buyer, Dutton-Lainson Company, breached its contract with VRT by failing to pay VRT royalties contemplated under the royalty provision. The district court ruled that Dutton-Lainson was obligated to pay both past-due and future royalties as provided in the contract. Dutton-Lainson thereupon appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals, asserting, in summary, that…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Jensen v. SnellingsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Lange Industries, Inc. v. Hallam Grain Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. In Re the Marriage of CastorMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kaslavage v. West Kern County Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Graham v. Town of LorisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Skyview Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Nebraska Life & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. DobiasNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Carpenter v. CullanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Almena State Bank v. EnfieldCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API