Legal Opinion

Krambeck v. City of Gretna

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1977No. 40997PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, C. J.

This case involves an inverse condemnation pro ceeding brought by the plaintiffs, Howard Krambeck and James Schram, owners of real estate in Sarpy County, Nebraska, against the defendant, City of Gretna. The plaintiffs alleged in their petition that the defendant appropriated certain of the plaintiffs’ land to public use by causing effluent from a sewerage treatment plant to flow across the plaintiffs’ land. *

Following the filing of the plaintiffs’ petition, the county court of Sarpy County appointed three freeholders of the county to serve as appraisers in the case. The appraisers viewed the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dawson County Irrigation Co. v. StuartNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Deitloff v. City of NorfolkNebraska Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sundell v. Town of New LondonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Scott v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  4. Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API