Adams v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
Defendant has moved to dismiss the complaint under RUSCC 12(b)(4) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1
FACTS
For the purpose of ruling on a motion under RUSCC 12(b)(4), the facts alleged by plaintiff are regarded as established. See, e.g., Balboa Insurance Co. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 543, at 544 n. 1 (1983) (SPECTOR, S.J.).
On May 4,1965, plaintiff, a Special Agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (the “FBI”), now retired, was injured in an automobile accident, caused by mechanical defect, while on official business. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Balboa Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Lindsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bettini v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Alexander v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Goolsby v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990
- Hulsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Lyons v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984