State v. Hurd
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 616.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. HURD, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Hurd,
2000-Ohio-2.] Securities—Making false representations in regard to registering transactions by description is not the equivalent of making false representations in regard to registering securities by description—Former R.C. 1707.44(B)(1), construed and applied. (No. 99-1140—Submitted March 7, 2000—Decided September 13, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 96APA03-326. __________________ {¶ 1} Appellee, Dwight I.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. WarnerOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. HurdOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Holderman v. Columbus Skyline Securities, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re Wood, 06ap-1032 (6-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Santos v. Buckeye 5, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Cardinal Minerals, L.L.C. v. BlattOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- EAP Ohio, L.L.C. v. Sunnydale Farms, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Fox v. Fergus Capital, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.