Legal Opinion
In Re Tudor
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided December 9, 2005No. 03-68935PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN E. HOFFMAN, JR., Bankruptcy Judge.
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation (“Chase”), which holds a claim secured by a mortgage on the residence of the Chapter 13 debtor, Paul Allen Tudor (“Debt- or”), filed a proof of claim that includes a mortgage arrearage of $9,230.35. The Debtor objected to the arrearage claim, arguing that three specific components of the claim should be disallowed: (1) prepet-ition attorney fees of $950 incurred by Chase in connection with a state court foreclosure action (“Prepetition Fees”); (2) prepetition costs of $450 for title work done in…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States National Bank v. Independent Insurance Agents of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & BildiscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hoopai v. HoopaiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re McLemoreUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
- In Re ThompsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Kreitzer v. Household Realty Corp. (In re Kreitzer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Bavelis v. Doukas (In re Bavelis)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.