United States v. Mittel-Carey
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge.
The district court issued an order suppressing statements made by the appellee, Robert Mittel-Carey, to FBI agents during a search of his home. Because we agree with the district court that a reasonable person in the appellee’s situation would have believed he was in custody during the search, we affirm the suppression order.
I. Background
“We view the facts in the light most favorable to the district court’s ruling with respect to [the defendant’s] motion to suppress.” 1 United States v. Kimball, 25 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1994).
A magistrate judge issued a search warrant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Orozco v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- United States v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BrobstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. RevelsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.