Legal Opinion

United States v. Brobst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 9, 2009No. 07-30284PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

Whether or not a search and seizure or a warrantless arrest is reasonable, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, depends on the traditional standards of reasonableness and not the law of a particular state. Therefore, we conclude Brobst’s constitutional rights were not violated, because (1) the search warrant described the place and things to be searched and seized with sufficient particularity; (2) probable cause existed for Brobst’s arrest; (3) Brobst’s post arrest statements were admissible; (4) the document the prosecutor failed to produce was not material…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. FioritoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Holder v. Town of SandownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API