United States v. Brobst
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Whether or not a search and seizure or a warrantless arrest is reasonable, within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment, depends on the traditional standards of reasonableness and not the law of a particular state. Therefore, we conclude Brobst’s constitutional rights were not violated, because (1) the search warrant described the place and things to be searched and seized with sufficient particularity; (2) probable cause existed for Brobst’s arrest; (3) Brobst’s post arrest statements were admissible; (4) the document the prosecutor failed to produce was not material…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Ewing v. City of StocktonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BershchanskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- United States v. OvertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. FioritoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Holder v. Town of SandownCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.