United States v. Revels
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In this interlocutory appeal, the United States seeks review of a district court’s pretrial order suppressing several incriminating statements made by Shequita Revels as having been obtained in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). The sole issue before us is whether Revels was “in custody” at the time she made the statements at issue. Because we conclude that a reasonable person in Revels’ position would have considered her freedom of movement to be restricted to a degree consistent with formal arrest, we hold that Revels…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- United States v. CraigheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. HargroveCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. LamyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Zar (Derek)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- State v. Ortiz, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2011
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.