Legal Opinion
People ex rel. Daniels v. Henshaw
California Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 1888No. 11724PublishedCited by 57 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County. .The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSearls, C. J.
This action was brought against the defendant, F. W. Henshaw, for usurpation of an office, as provided by the Code of Civil Procedure, sections 803 to 810.
The judgment in the court below was against defendant, who appeals.
The case comes up on the judgment roll, containing the following agreed statement of facts: —
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the respective parties hereto, plaintiff and defendant, —
“ 1. That there was a municipal election held in the city of Oakland, on the eighth day of March, 1886, at which relator, S. F. Daniels, received the highest number of votes…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- People ex rel. Smith v. Judge of the Twelfth DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex Parte BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Kennedy v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Davies v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.