Hamilton v. Rhee
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court on the defendants’ motion to dismiss and the plaintiffs opposition thereto. Because the pro se plaintiff has not stated a claim upon which relief can be granted, the court grants the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
II. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 1
Since approximately 2003, the plaintiff, a blind teacher, was employed by the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) and taught visually impaired, blind and special education students. Compl. at 2. On…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Norris v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Collins v. Compass Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013