Legal Opinion

Munich Assur. Co. v. Dodwell & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1904No. 975PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

GIRBERT, Circuit Judge.

Dodwell & Co., Limited, a corporation, the appellee, was the charterer of the steamship Tacoma, and as such charterer it received on board a cargo of merchandise for transportation from Seattle to Nome, Alaska. Part of the cargo belonged to the appellee, but the greater portion thereof belonged to various shippers, to whom as a carrier it issued bills of lading. The appellee thereupon obtained from the Munich Assurance Company, Rimited, the appellant herein, insurance on cargo valued at $100,000 in the steamship Tacoma, at and from Seattle to Nome, “against general…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Hagan v. Scottish InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  5. Waring v. . the Indemnity Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Springfield Dyeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  2. Kroder Reubel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Great Lakes Transit Corp. v. Interstate S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  5. Willamette Nav. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API