Legal Opinion

Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Crosby

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 13, 1936No. Nos. 6941, 6942PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellee was appointed receiver for Reed & Duecker, Inc., under a creditors’ bill. There came into his possession as receiver a quantity of wire rope belonging to John A. Roebling’s Sons Company. Continuing to operate the business of the firm, he entered into an agreement with the Roebling Company to handle its rope, then on hand and thereafter to be shipped, on consignment. He was to be paid for his services on a commission basis, and he agreed to insure the rope against loss or damage by fire. Pursuant to this agreement he entered into contracts of insurance with…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Deming & Co. v. Merchants' Cotton-press, etc., Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Mills v. Merchants' Cotton-Press Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Sullivan MacHinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Pond Creek Coal Co. v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Eagle Fire Ins. Co. v. GayleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  2. Snauffer v. StimsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
  3. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
  4. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API