Legal Opinion
Automobile Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Springfield Dyeing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 2, 1940No. 7096PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JONES, Circuit Judge.
On April 1, 1937, Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford, the appellant, issued its “Bailees’ Customers Policy” in the principal sum of $20,000 to Springfield Dyeing Company, Inc., the appellee. Springfield was a dyer and finisher of silk or silk products belonging to others; and ninety-eight per cent, of its business came from Roxborough Knitting Mills, Inc., a manufacturer of silk hosiery.
The policy insured Springfield “for account of whom it may concern, on all kinds of lawful goods and/or articles * * * being the property of its customers while in possession of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Stipcich v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Luckenbach v. W. J. McCahan Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Home Insurance v. Baltimore Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
- California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- The Union Insurance Society of Canton, Ltd. v. William Gluckin & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
- Carriers Insurance Co. v. American Policyholders' InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Jewelers Mutual Insurance Company v. Julien Balogh and Harriet Balogh, D/B/A Balogh's of Coral GablesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Bolton v. ZieglerDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.