Legal Opinion

Willamette Nav. Co. v. Hartford Fire Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 5, 1923No. 3894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWolverton, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The Willamette Navigation Company, being a bailee for hire, *466whether as carrier or warehouseman, could lawfully insure the entire interest in the paper rolls entrusted to its care for carriage or storage, and, if loss occurred, would be entitled to demand and collect from the insurer the entire amount of the loss sustained covered by the insurance. In such case, however, it would hold the excess above its own interest in the paper for the use and benefit of the owners of the paper, or others concerned therein. Phœnix Ins. Co. v. Erie & W. Transportation Co.,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. York Company v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  4. California Insurance v. Union Compress Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Graves & Barnewall v. Boston Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1805

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. Curo Texas Holding, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API