Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
We granted the Appellants’ Petition for Allowance of Appeal to consider a single issue: whether an annual bonus should be prorated as wages over the whole year or only in the quarter in which it was paid.1 Both the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board and Commonwealth Court, 150 Pa.Cmwlth. 395, 615 A.2d 975, concluded that claimant’s bonus paid on February 27, 1987, should be considered as part of claimant’s wages for the quarter in which it was paid. Because we disagree, we reverse.
*428Our scope of review in this matter is well founded. We will not disturb the Board’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Peterson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Boro of Midland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hannaberry HVAC v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Kiebler v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Beardsley v. State Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Eljer Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Borough of Honesdale v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.