Beardsley v. State Employes' Retirement Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LEADBETTER, Judge.
Petitioners, thirty-nine present and former senior management employees of the Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency (PHEAA), appeal from the order of the State Employes’ Retirement Board (Board) which determined that payments made pursuant to PHEAA’s Executive Marketing Incentive Program (EMIP) were not compensation under the Pennsylvania State Employees’ Retirement Code (Code).1 The questions presented are: (1) whether payments, which PHEAA began making to its senior management employees in 1987 pursuant to EMIP, are covered compensation under the Code; (2)…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dowler v. Public School Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Miller v. State Employes' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Wyland v. Public School Employes' Retirement BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth, Public School Employees' Retirement System v. Pennsylvania School Boards Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. Pennsylvania Industries for the Blind & HandicappedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Marinucci v. State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hanna v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Pettineo v. City of Philadelphia Law Department-Claims DivisionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Harrisburg Area Community College v. Pennsylvania State Employees' Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.