Legal Opinion

Borough of Honesdale v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 17, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

The Borough of Honesdale (Borough) and the State Worker’s Insurance Fund appeal an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed the decision of a referee1 dismissing the Borough’s petition to review the calculation of Daniel Martin’s (Claimant) average weekly wage.

Claimant suffered a heart attack on November 28, 1990, while performing his duties as a member of the Borough’s Volunteer Ambulance Corps. Under Section 601(a)(2) of the Act, 77 P.S. § 1031(a)(2),2 Claimant was deemed to be an “employee” entitled to receive workers’ compensation benefits even though…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Deremer v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Mercy Catholic Medical Center v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Carmen Paliotta General Construction & Federal Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Deichler v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Capuano v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Fearon v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Weissman v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API