Legal Opinion

Boro of Midland v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 31, 1989No. 2637 C.D. 1986PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, Judge.

The Boro of Midland (Boro) and General Accident Insurance Company (collectively, petitioners) petition for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board which affirmed a decision of the referee awarding compensation to Rose Granito (claimant) pursuant to a review petition filed by claimant. We affirm.

The decedent, Felix Granito, died on May 8, 1985, as a result of multiple trauma sustained while in the course of his employment with the Boro. Pursuant to a Notice of Compensation Payable filed by the Boro on August 13, 1985, claimant was paid compensation at a rate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Temple v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. Beebe v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Eljer Industries v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Exide Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Kamenas)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Pieretti v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API